space
Reader Reviews | |
Review by Patrick Burney (310112) Rating (8/10) Review
by Patrick Burney This book addresses this common epidemic. It uses specific examples of alternative methods that may combat this problem. These examples are anecdotes written by Rick Evans and Elizabeth Robertson. Professor Robertson’s account focused primarily on the individual level because she practiced her methods in a writing lab. This writing lab was meant to have a one on one, teach to student relationship. Professor Evans account was aggregated to a larger scale because he attempted to practice his methods with a whole English Class. Although different scale and sizes existed between the two anecdotes, an overall consensus of how to combat the problem was developed. The book emphasizes three different approaches in improving student’s ability to read and write. The first theory that is an underlining theme throughout the whole book is the act of writing about what one has read. What this means is that a student will read something and immediately write about what they had read. The important thing to note in this process is that when the student writes they must be aware that they will not be graded upon this writing. The level of informality must be made clear. This is significant because it eliminates the filter that exists within a student’s brain when they know they are about to be graded. Some students over think, to maybe alter their thinking when they are told they will be graded on their writing. This eliminates that fear and opens up the students mind. It gives the student freedom to think and comprehend. The second tool that this book draws attention to is the "individualized approach," it is such a significant part of this book it even made it into the title. The idea that a teacher should cater to students or various groups of students is a predominate factor in combating falling reading and writing levels. Many students begin to fall into this vacuum stream of frustration because the material does not pertain to them. It is easier for a student to lose interest in their work when it is unfamiliar material. If teachers were to cater to their students interests or demographics and eventually progress into more difficult literature it would be much easier to not only initially grab the attention of their students but to hold the attention of their students over a long period.
The third and perhaps most significant tools that will aid in
the development of future readers that is noted in this book is
that the teachers must be willing to put in more. For "an
individualized approach" to be effective, it is obvious the
teachers themselves will have to put in more work. If the teachers
and administration expect huge strides from their students they
have to put the same amount of time and work into the process.
For example if a student was told to write about what they had
just read the teacher would have to actively ask question to further
stimulate the student. The professor must be willing to invest
time with their students if progression with the language is the
common goal. A
final thing that stood out too me is the age of the book. The
book was published in 1985. I feel that this is so significant
because much of the content of this book was ahead of its time
and even is still revolutionary to this day. |
|
Column Ends |
space